Research has previously proven that exercise can cause an increase in an appetite-stimulating hormone. Research is beginning to aim towards finding the connections between specific types of activity and the appetite regulating hormones they effect to optimize weight loss routines.
Many processes within the body can be
attributed to hormones. Previous research had
confirmed the idea that there are particular hormones responsible for appetite
and energy balance. Leptin, a “satiety hormone”, is produced in adipose tissue (also
known as fat cells) and responsible for energy balance and feeling full after
meals. This signal allows the body to
know when to stop eating, and therefore can be connected to the process of weight
loss. It would be easy to assume that
people who are obese have a lower level of leptin, and therefore have a harder
time feeling full after consuming meals, but this is not the case. It has been found that obese people actually
have the highest levels of leptin, however their bodies do not sense these
levels and therefore can be considered as “leptin-resistant”.
Ghrelin is a hormone secreted by
specialized cells in the stomach that acts on the brain to trigger a rise in
appetite. Levels of ghrelin rise before
meals and fall shortly after. High
levels of ghrelin have been attributed to making high calorie foods look more
appealing. Because these hormones play a
significant role in the amount of calories consumed and weight loss, recent
research in obesity is looking towards how the body utilizes these hormones and
what can effect them for possible solutions to overconsumption of food.
Past research had shown that exercise can
increase levels of ghrelin in the body, therefore you could become hungrier
than if you weren’t to have exercised. Recent research at the
University of Wyoming has found an interesting twist relating to the type
of exercise and its effects on ghrelin and the satiating hormones (including
leptin) in the body.
The research completed by the University of
Wyoming sought to find a connection between appetite-related hormones and
exercise. The group involved in the
study was a group of women (either walkers or runners) who exercised for 60
minutes every other day, while resting on alternating days between for 60
minutes. After either exercising for an
hour or resting for an hour, the participating women were taken to have blood
drawn to measure the levels of hormones post-60 minute interval and then directed
towards a buffet to measure and compare the amount of calories consumed.
Similar to results from other research, the
women who ran were found to have an increased production ghrelin than the women
who walked or rested. Remembering that
ghrelin is responsible for initiating meal and increasing appetite along with
the idea that exercising makes you hungrier, you would think that the runners
would have had the greatest appetite and consumed the most calories from the
buffet. However, contrast to relevant research that says that an increased
level of ghrelin will lead to an increased appetite, these women were the group
that consumed hundreds of calories less at the buffet than those who did not
have the higher levels of ghrelin.
So why did the women with the higher levels of ghrelin eat less
than those that did not produce a higher amount?
Researchers believe that the hormones
responsible for satiety (leptin being amongst them) could have overridden the
effectiveness of the higher level of ghrelin, allowing the runners to become
satiated sooner. The groups of resting
women and walkers were found to consume more calories at the buffet than
necessary.
While research is still preliminary, it can
be concluded that it would appear that moderate exercise (similar to jogging or
running) may allow the body to better control the hormones responsible for
hunger and satiety, unconsciously leading to those who exercise to control
their portions at meals. Also, since
walking had no effect on the satiety hormones, those who are looking to promote
weight loss by increasing their activity through walking might be at a
disadvantage.
No comments:
Post a Comment